Daniel Quillen, 1940-2011

Graeme Segal has written a really wonderful obituary for Dan Quillen (23 June 2011 in the Guardian).

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under math

2 responses to “Daniel Quillen, 1940-2011

  1. My condolences—I remember Dan Quillen well and fondly from my Oxford days. He was youthful and fun to talk with.

  2. I was asked by the AMS to contribute my memories of Dan Quillen.
    Here is what I wrote.
    A.R.
    ********************************************************************************************
    The name of Quillen featured already in the very first topology seminar
    I attended as a graduate student in Cambridge in 1970. It was given by Frank Adams, who talked about the then recent work of Quillen and Sullivan on the solution of the Adams conjecture. Frank spoke about both Dan and Dennis with an unusual amount of respect!

    I actually met both Quillen and Sullivan at the same time, when I spent a year at IHES 1973-4. Sullivan’s interest in surgery theory was naturally greater than Quillen’s. Both Dan and Jean were kind to me, and I was a frequent visitor at Pavillon 8 of the Residence de l’Ormaille. Although I did not talk to Dan all that much about mathematics there were plenty of other topics, and I was always impressed by his seriousness of purpose and independence of mind, allied with a winning personal modesty.

    Soon after Dan moved to Oxford in 1984 I invited him and his family to visit us in Edinburgh. I asked him if MIT had offered to match his Oxford offer: he answered that to do this they would have had to cut his MIT salary by two-thirds!

    On my occasional visits to Oxford I would always call on the Quillens, who were as kind to me as they had been at IHES. There was in fact one occasion when Dan and I did talk about mathematics: over dinner I mentioned that I had worked out a formula for the projective class of a finitely dominated chain complex. He asked me to come to his office the next day and explain it to him in detail – it turned out that he needed
    just such a formula for his work on K_0 of nonunital rings: I was most flattered! But I should have spent much more time talking to Dan about his mathematics. Too late now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s